Posts Tagged ‘Style’
Interview With Gary Graham
(Click image to zoom in)
Designer Gary Graham’s Spring 2010 collection was one of the shining examples during New York Fashion Week this past September. With the “Fashion’s Night Out” event starting off the week, the question of how the economy would effect fashion loomed over almost every show, Graham being one of the exceptions. The CFDA/Vogue ‘09 Fashion Fund finalist put out a collection that was aggressive but not over the top. There was the evidence of tradition with looks that clearly narrated a time and place from America’s history, but there was also that transformation into something modern and attractive that kept me interested. The collection worked because of a designer’s strong vision and concept. I’ve always been so interested as to how a designer at this level works. They live in a middle ground that other creative professionals don’t have to necessarily stay at. A designer has to be part historian and part psychic at the same time. To be honest to your inspiration, present a product that is culturally relevant, and to be an expert craftsman, all in an ever changing environment is nothing short of amazing and something that honestly fascinates me. This is why I was so glad that Gary Graham agreed to be part of our ongoing Artist Interview Series. I found Graham’s commentary on fashion to be so insightful that anyone can at some level find some inspiration. It’s always great to meet someone who you know could make something interesting whether they have a budget of 5 dollars or 5,000 dollars. With all the economic worry that surrounds the creative industry right now, it’s artists like Gary Graham who show that one’s vision and concept rises above it all.
Hello, Every fashion review always uses the term “(insert designer’s name)’s woman is…” So what is the Gary Graham woman like?
She has a casual approach to glamour and definitely likes to mix disparate styles together. She has a history of Goth and punk but sort of keeps it on the back burner and expresses it in a more rustic sort of way.
How has your idea of that woman changed over the years?
I once did a show where I divided the collection into three women: a scientist, a farmer living off the land, and an isolated society lady. I think I always sort of mix these three together but now its become more precise and refined and not so aggressive.
With your Spring 2010 RTW collection, there seemed to be a big influence from silent films with a sort of Lillian Gish type of muse. What were some of the inspirations behind this collection?
Kenneth Anger’s Hollywood Babylon was a huge influence on me as a kid. Our library had a copy of the sequel, which had the photos of the Black Dahlia that I would stare at. There are some stills, which I referenced for this collection, of Anger appearing with Lillian Gish in A Midsummer Night’s Dream. I wanted to think about women from two generations coming together, one at the end of her life and one just starting out.
I also found this photo of Imogene Coco after a performance with her head down. Her posture was so different from how I remembered her on television shows, where she always seemed so up and crazy. It was the downtime of Imogene that I was trying to capture.
What would you say is your approach to fashion?
There is a transformation that happens with Tallulah Bankhead’s character in Life Boat, not just in her wardrobe but within her, when she uses her diamond bracelet as fishing lure. It’s a moment of letting go. I think that was a big influence on me—seeing glamour torn apart or worn, either by weather or life circumstances.
I sometimes look at the creation process as making problems and then finding the answers through the work you create. What are some problems in fashion you like to answer with your collection?
I often work from narratives or scenarios. For next fall I am working on constructing a Masonic order of women in Pennsylvania who controlled all the building of the roads. I am also thinking about the story of the Fox sisters, who were famous 19th-century mediums. So the problem is connecting them all with research. The research has me thinking about the history of librarians and how their roles have changed in the digital age. I’ve been talking to librarians and getting their views on the way information is being accessed and the Dewey Decimal System, so this will create ideas and new problems. For example, this might raise the question what do the librarians and the masons have to do with each other? Were they enemies or did they work together? Also, if the women masons of Pennsylvania controlled the roads, how did the politics between the men and the women play out? I can imagine women masons stitching the roadways into their quilts and then somehow they would materialize, like sorcery.
When was it that you felt like you understood fashion, that it was what you wanted to do?
I think in high school I figured out the transformative power clothing can have, especially in relation to the physical and emotional changes one goes through in those years. I feel like I’m only really getting it now, in terms of the big picture. Which really just goes back to that DEVO song, We’re Through Being Cool.
I was doing some performance type work in college and realized there was a discipline to fashion that I loved. The reality of selling things I made was also attractive. I was excited by the idea of creating a garment and it then being worn in the “real world” – the theater that happens out on the street at 2 a.m. in the pouring rain.
How did you get your start in the business?
I started in a basement on West Broadway and sold out of a store called Shack. It was owned by J. Morgan Puett, who is now just working on her artwork but she was a big influence on me in terms of fabric manipulation and garment dyeing.
You just opened your flagship store in Tribeca, how’s the response been so far?
It has been very interesting. We do not advertise so it’s all by word of mouth, neighborhood men and women, we just started a few men’s pieces, and customers that buy our clothes in other cities, and from our boutique inside ABC Carpet and Home. For me it’s really like having guerilla research. You get direct feedback and it’s all very exciting. We are planning many events in the new space, everything from dance performances to film. I am currently working with my friend Liz Collins on a sock monkey terror film that will coincide with her sock monkey sweaters. On the business side, the response has been great.
The economy has been a big topic in fashion lately and I felt some of the recent collections at New York Fashion Week seemed to reflect that with a more consumer, commercial friendly apparel. As a designer how much do economic factors go into your thought process when designing a collection?
There are different economic factors. One is the overall health of a company in terms of cash flow and then the details of margins, profit, and volume. They all affect budgets, which then allow or constrain the amount of money you get to spend on development. So this could come down to being able or not being able to buy a certain lace or beading or leather. It does not ever effect my initial inspiration or concept, which is ultimately free. No one is going to say I cannot be inspired by a Masonic woman who was a witch in Pennsylvania in 1840 but we can say as a company that maybe the apron I designed that was inspired by her with intricate lace work on it is not going to retail for under 1200 and therefore we are not going to sell very many and maybe you should think of something else in addition to this item. That’s sort of how it works. The trick is not letting the two extremes; the sellable pieces and the collection pieces cancel each other out into a void.
There have been many complaints that fashion weeks are becoming too much about entertainment instead of design. How do you feel about the current state of fashion?
Fashion along with everything else is moving so fast that its inevitable there will be a new medium that comes out of all of this. I think DIY fashion is going to take the place of so much. It would be great if home ec became relevant in a new way, reconnecting us to the physical act of making things. I think what Alice Waters is doing with slow food could be done with fashion, if only in terms of making a connection between human labor and the end product, or at the very least an appreciation of quality.
(Gary Graham is a fashion designer from NYC. You can learn more about Graham at his website www.garygrahamnyc.com)
Alexander McQueen Resort 2010
I was looking at this collection right before I left for Vegas last week and kind of just wrote the clothes off as too similar to the men’s collection. Fast forward to tonight when I was looking at these clothes again and fell in love with them. While I didn’t quite like the pretentious tone of “The Artist” that came with the men’s collection, but these clothes seem to reflect more about the art instead of the artist. They cover different genres and styles: pop, abstract expressionism, surrealism, etc. This collection really is a post-modern work of art in itself.
(Click image to zoom in)
Christian Dior Fall Couture 2009
If you close your eyes and picture Lucille Ball dancing to Madonna’s “Like a Virgin” then you’ll probably imagine something close what John Galliano dreamed up for Christian Dior’s fall couture collection. I have to be honest when I first saw this collection I wasn’t too impressed, but after a day or two it’s now my favorite collection of the season so far. The bright colors and silhouettes of the 1950’s and the post-punk style of the late 80’s makes these pieces feel familiar while being completely over dramatic and bizarre. While it might not be as ornate as Givenchy or as classy as Elle Saab, it is the most lively and complete collection thus far. In fact, this is the one collection I’d love to photograph of this year so far.
The Fashion Video, the Usual Embarrassment of a Brand
They always start to pour out in Spring/Summer, and I’ve always wondered why. Fashion videos, surprise collaborations with musicians, and other attention grabbers that have nothing to do with the clothes always seem to follow the release of the Spring/Summer Men’s collections. Is it because they know we don’t care as much? That men in general don’t need to buy a new suit every season? Is it all a ploy to get us to buy more? Or is there an effort to boast their pure artistic side, to gain respect from artists and show that fashion labels aren’t just a business? I don’t have the answer to these questions, I just know that with all the narrative short films from fashion labels that I see a year, there are probably only two that are decent. I started to become curious this year about the reasons behind that. How is it that a label can create the most mature and artistic creation on the runway and have the most immature and juvenile art represent those clothes elsewhere? My quick guess is that it has to do with image, where style is necessary, not content. A lot of videos (I’m thinking of Chanel right now) are pure style with nothing else, not even good product placement involved, it’s like an Oliver Stone film ran amuck usually. A lot of quick editing, extreme camera angles, troubled models living the hard life of success but can’t figure out how to have sex until their fashion label shows them the way. It’s all very embarrassing and thankfully you have brands like Band of Outsiders who consistently create brilliant, simple videos to display their brand.
Another brand that usually never disappoints is Yves Saint Laurent. With their Spring/Summer 2010 collection they produced a film from Samuel Benchetrit that follows a young boy, (Benchetrit’s son) who finds a hotel room key and takes on the life of a stranger. The film is simple and charming and very refreshing. It is a direct tribute to the classic french type of films that France is known for. The film I really felt it mimicked the most was François Truffaut’s first film Les Mistons where a group of kids develop a crush on an older woman. In the YSL film the boy works around the concept of desire. He goes through the strangers belongings, plays dress up, and reads his personal letters from the stranger’s lover. In the end, the boy reunites a couple without either of them knowing really. Maybe it was because he is just a child and adults are too wrapped up in life to resolve our own problems with love. The child can’t yet see the levels of miscommunication that come with age. The boy wishes to be an adult and the adults wish to be with each other, kind of cliche I can admit but it’s filmed in such a simple and honest way that doesn’t insult your intelligence such as the Alexander McQueen video I posted earlier. The odd thing is that I wasn’t really a fan of the collection but thought the video was great. In general, this shows the continued effort at YSL to display a level of refinement and maturity while not becoming stuffy or old fashioned.
Yves Saint Laurent Collection Homme Printemps/Eté 2010 – Film.
Yves Saint Laurent Collection Homme Printemps/Eté 2010 – Film. from official ysl on Vimeo.
Les Mistons by François Truffaut
Indie’s Biggest Problem: STYLE
I have a really bad habit when it comes to listening to new music, I instantly compare it to old music. I do not mean to belittle any new music or stick to the call that music sucks compared to old music. It is simply that it’s the easiest way to describe a new song to someone. We live in a trivial world, literally. Be honest, there is no greater joy out of learning a fun fact from a Snapple cap than reading a book most of the time. It seems these days that I impress more people by winning a game of Trivial Pursuit than by mentioning my college degree.
I myself am stuck in this world of fast facts (or factoids as I hear a lot of people call them), and I can’t help but categorize anything I see or hear as quickly as possible and start comparing something to something else without letting it stand on it’s own credentials. This is because it’s a fast, cheap way to to get to a point and it’s also how most media operates now.
The Indie culture is really not one look or sound, but it’s all based on one common factor: style. Style is cheap no matter how you look at it. It’s a good hook but awfully shallow. Style doesn’t work by making an image to project yourself, it makes a mask to hide yourself from people. Stereotypes come from style and never from the actual person.
So what music was I listening to that made me go off on this rant? Well it was Albert Hammond Jr.’s new album ¿Como te Llama? I know this article so far has sounded completely judgmental and negative but I am actually a big fan of his music and this new album. Everything about it just works and is a welcomed addition to the rock music scene and reminded me of exactly why I do love the Indie music scene, ok well not the scene but definitely the music.
As I listen to the album it is filled with musical and lyrical references to the great glam and proto-punk rockers of the early seventies, David Bowie, Marc Bolan, Lou Reed, Tom Petty, (I also listened to some Richard Hell after this and saw similarities but that would be a very deep but welcomed reference if that did exist). The style of the album of course made me just start referencing everything I could in probably the most annoying way possible, but there was a reason album rose above my own personal audio trivia contest, and that was that Mr. Hammond made sure he came through first. It is very clear in the album that this isn’t about capturing a sound, it’s about creating music, which are two completely different things.
While the sounds might hark back to Lou Reed and David Bowie, there is not one single shred of the attitude that those artists exuded found on this record. The masterful decadence of something like Aladdin Sane made you feel so confident that you should unbutton your top on your shirt and show some skin while this album probably will just want you to throw on a sports jacket. Hammond Jr’s insecurities, shortcomings, fears, and aspirations, a.k.a. himself come through on this album, not some image or slick style. Taking various aesthetics and influences and making them your own is what art is about, taking what you know and using it to express yourself.
That point also became way too apparent when I went to “First Thursday” in Portland a couple of weeks ago, (I live in Oregon for those that are confused by that last comment, First Thursday is when the art galleries present their new collections). It was a very disappointing night to say the least, (the gallery part, hanging out with old friends was most enjoyable). In a growing community of artists that are still on the underground spotlight when it comes to the art world you would think that the displays would have consisted of more work that would be considered to out there for more commercial communities. From what I saw it was just a bunch of kids playing grown-up. A lot of work made to fit an image, that embodied a style and not a concept or purpose. The whole Pearl scene that night just came off shallow and empty. Not all the work was bad and nothing was particularly horrible, it was just so obvious it was made to fit an image instead someone trying to create the best work they possibly could. When the look or sound of something gets in the way of why you’re doing it, the consequences are usually crippling. The people who attended these shows was the most disturbing element of the night by far though. Nobody was talking about the art, (which on second thought, I don’t blame them) or about anything really, they were all just talking about how cool they were. It was a hipster showcase to show how much style they had. I felt like I was going into a singles bar and having to watch everyone try to impress people as hard as they could.
The main talk I heard that night was the usual annoying chant of [insert name] being too mainstream. This made me cringe and I’m not going to go in depth of that subject because it’s just too infuriating. I’ll will just end with this: popularity exists for a reason and while it is tainted by our present day PR system, it should never be a factor in someone’s appreciation in life. Indie is just a style like another, it doesn’t stand for being non-mainstream, it is just an aesthetic. Style is the hollow image that too many people desperately crave and cling to, but it is nothing and will get you nowhere. Now if you need a fast “factoid” way to describe this article, it would go like this, “The popular new album was able to display more artistic value than all the underground artists with their non-corrupted core values could.”
-Tim Moore.
(Photo by Tim Moore, http://www.timothypaulmoore.com)






















